Search for a command to run...
Mastering Database Schema Management in NestJS: Sync vs Migration Explained
Our company comprises seasoned professionals, each an expert in their field. Customer satisfaction is our top priority, exceeding clients' needs. We ensure competitive pricing and quality in web and mobile development without compromise.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment.
A modern community for developers to learn, share, and grow together.
Discover the most practical AI tools that save time, boost productivity, and actually work.
Unlock Productivity, Creativity, and Growth Using These Free AI Tools in 2025
"A Developer’s Guide to the Best Payment Processors for Modern Web Apps"
Protect your privacy, secure your data, and browse with peace of mind.
When working with databases in NestJS and TypeORM, there are two common approaches to managing changes in the database schema: Synchronization (Sync) and Migrations. These two methods help developers align the database structure with the entities in the code, but they serve different purposes and have distinct use cases.
In this blog post, we will explore the differences between synchronization and migrations in the context of NestJS and TypeORM, providing code examples, pros and cons, and insights into when to use each approach.
NestJS is a progressive Node.js framework that helps build scalable and maintainable server-side applications. It works seamlessly with TypeORM, a popular ORM (Object-Relational Mapper) for TypeScript and JavaScript, which simplifies interactions with databases.
TypeORM allows developers to define the schema of a database in the form of entities. Once entities are defined, the database structure can be synchronized with the application using either sync (automatic) or migration (manual) methods.
Synchronization is a feature in TypeORM that automatically updates the database schema whenever you change your entities. This means that when you modify your entity classes, TypeORM automatically adjusts the underlying database structure.
In NestJS, you can enable synchronization by setting the synchronize option to true in the TypeORM configuration file. Here’s a simple example.
import { TypeOrmModule } from '@nestjs/typeorm';
@Module({
imports: [
TypeOrmModule.forRoot({
type: 'postgres', // Database type
host: 'localhost',
port: 5432,
username: 'user',
password: 'password',
database: 'mydb',
entities: [__dirname + '/**/*.entity{.ts,.js}'],
synchronize: true, // Enable synchronization
}),
],
})
export class AppModule {}
With synchronization enabled, TypeORM will check the entities defined in your application and automatically create or alter tables in the database when you start the application.
Automatic Updates: Schema changes are immediately applied without additional commands.
Fast Development: Ideal for early stages of development when schema changes are frequent.
Simplified Workflow: No need to write migration files manually.
Not Suitable for Production: Sync is not recommended for production environments because any change in entities can accidentally drop data or result in unintended modifications.
Lack of Control: You have less control over what exactly gets changed in the database schema.
Risk of Data Loss: When altering or deleting tables, there's a risk of data loss since sync doesn’t always preserve data.
Migrations in TypeORM provide a more controlled and production-safe way to update the database schema. Instead of automatically applying changes to the database, you generate migration files that contain the necessary SQL commands to update the schema. These migrations are manually executed when required, giving you more control over how and when schema changes are applied.
Here’s how you can use migrations in NestJS with TypeORM.
First, make sure to configure TypeORM without enabling synchronization:
import { TypeOrmModule } from '@nestjs/typeorm';
@Module({
imports: [
TypeOrmModule.forRoot({
type: 'postgres',
host: 'localhost',
port: 5432,
username: 'user',
password: 'password',
database: 'mydb',
entities: [__dirname + '/**/*.entity{.ts,.js}'],
synchronize: false, // Disable synchronization
}),
],
})
export class AppModule {}
Now, whenever you modify your entities, you need to generate a migration:
npx typeorm migration:generate -n CreateUserTable
Once the migration is generated, you can run it:
npx typeorm migration:run
Here’s an example of a migration file generated by TypeORM:
import { MigrationInterface, QueryRunner } from 'typeorm';
export class CreateUserTable1658886886786 implements MigrationInterface {
public async up(queryRunner: QueryRunner): Promise<void> {
await queryRunner.query(`
CREATE TABLE "user" (
"id" SERIAL NOT NULL,
"username" character varying NOT NULL,
"email" character varying NOT NULL,
"password" character varying NOT NULL,
PRIMARY KEY ("id")
)
`);
}
public async down(queryRunner: QueryRunner): Promise<void> {
await queryRunner.query(`DROP TABLE "user"`);
}
}
Control: You have complete control over the database schema and can review the changes before applying them.
Safe for Production: Migrations can be tested on staging environments before running them in production.
Rollback: You can easily roll back a migration if something goes wrong.
Manual Process: You need to generate and apply migrations manually.
Additional Overhead: Involves more steps compared to the synchronization method.
Potential for Human Error: Mistakes can occur when generating or modifying migrations.
| Feature | Synchronization | Migrations |
| Automatic Schema Updates | Yes | No (manual) |
| Production Suitability | Not recommended | Highly recommended |
| Control Over Changes | Less control | Full control |
| Rollback Capability | No | Yes |
| Risk of Data Loss | High, especially in production | Low, as changes can be thoroughly tested |
| Ease of Use | Easy and quick to use | Requires more effort |
| Flexibility | Less flexible; applies changes immediately | More flexible; allows versioning |
Use Synchronization (Sync) during early development stages where the database schema is changing frequently. This allows for quick iterations and fast feedback on changes. However, switch to migrations as the project matures.
Use Migrations when your project is moving into production or when you need more control over how schema changes are applied. Migrations offer a safer way to manage changes, with rollback options and a clearer versioning mechanism.
Development Environment: Use synchronize: true for rapid development and testing but switch it off before deploying to production.
Staging and Production: Always use migrations for production environments. Migrations allow you to track and manage schema changes systematically.
Test Migrations: Run migrations in a staging environment before applying them to production. This ensures you catch any potential issues early.
Version Control for Migrations: Keep your migration files under version control (e.g., Git) to track the history of schema changes across your team.
Backup Your Database: Before applying migrations in production, always back up your database to prevent data loss in case something goes wrong.
Understanding when to use each approach is key to managing database changes effectively in NestJS applications. By following best practices and carefully planning your database updates, you can avoid potential pitfalls and ensure smooth database management in your project.
Happy coding!